Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with snap
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 44
Use this tag only when the language used would affect the question significantly (if your question uses Snap! as an example, but does not focus on the language itself, you need not use the tag).
15
votes
Accepted
What can Snap! do that Scratch cannot?
The analogy is far from perfect, but Snap! is to Scratch as Mycroft is to Sherlock.
For me, the big advantage for Snap! … In Snap! functions are 'first class citizens', thus functions can be passed to other functions as parameters, or be stored in lists, or (pretty much) whatever, and so Snap! …
- 1,266